will
Forum Regular
Posts: 90 
Likes: 7
Last Online: Aug 22, 2017 1:27:47 GMT -6
Registered: Apr 24, 2016 1:25:14 GMT -6
|
Post by will on May 5, 2016 8:43:39 GMT -6
in the case there is a technical error leading to an accident legally who would be responsible? Would there be a case for a lawsuit? excellent question In the case of an accident, which, with the right programming, shouldn't happen, I do NOT think that the company should take the whole blame, for example : An AI might not be the fault, it could be the cars motor, amount of petrol/diesel (or maybe electricity) .. Etc.. If the person has tampered with the machinery of the car, it might not function properly. I think that autonomy in cars is a GOOD thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 5, 2016 8:46:03 GMT -6
Technology possibly can't make the kind of judgements a human can though, that's the thing.
|
|
Vincent Van Ghoul
Forum Lover
That is not drunk which be eternal dry Yet with strange brewing, even beers imbibe.
Posts: 396
Likes: 69
Last Online: Jan 24, 2017 0:33:00 GMT -6
Registered: Oct 13, 2015 3:51:10 GMT -6
|
Post by Vincent Van Ghoul on May 5, 2016 11:46:18 GMT -6
Technology possibly can't make the kind of judgements a human can though, that's the thing. You're right. If programmed, and designed properly they can make better ones. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 5, 2016 11:48:03 GMT -6
Technology possibly can't make the kind of judgements a human can though, that's the thing. You're right. If programmed, and designed properly they can make better ones. Haha well you might be right but technology still had a lot of advancing to do before it gets to that point. |
|
Vincent Van Ghoul
Forum Lover
That is not drunk which be eternal dry Yet with strange brewing, even beers imbibe.
Posts: 396
Likes: 69
Last Online: Jan 24, 2017 0:33:00 GMT -6
Registered: Oct 13, 2015 3:51:10 GMT -6
|
Post by Vincent Van Ghoul on May 5, 2016 11:59:08 GMT -6
You're right. If programmed, and designed properly they can make better ones. Haha well you might be right but technology still had a lot of advancing to do before it gets to that point. You're right again. But that means we should invest more time and money into getting it right, not dial it down. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 5, 2016 12:02:58 GMT -6
Haha well you might be right but technology still had a lot of advancing to do before it gets to that point. You're right again. But that means we should invest more time and money into getting it right, not dial it down. Google already does have some self-driving cars on the road in I think California. |
|
Vincent Van Ghoul
Forum Lover
That is not drunk which be eternal dry Yet with strange brewing, even beers imbibe.
Posts: 396
Likes: 69
Last Online: Jan 24, 2017 0:33:00 GMT -6
Registered: Oct 13, 2015 3:51:10 GMT -6
|
Post by Vincent Van Ghoul on May 5, 2016 12:07:31 GMT -6
You're right again. But that means we should invest more time and money into getting it right, not dial it down. Google already does have some self-driving cars on the road in I think California. That's what I linked to on page 2. theoatmeal.com/blog/google_self_driving_car |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 5, 2016 12:08:24 GMT -6
Yeah I'll take a look at that article. |
|
lowenquicksilver
Forum Lover
I'm off to make trouble for the establishment
Posts: 334 
Likes: 26
Last Online: Aug 24, 2016 14:10:00 GMT -6
Registered: Feb 5, 2016 17:51:26 GMT -6
|
Post by lowenquicksilver on May 5, 2016 13:41:22 GMT -6
I think the roads will be safer with self driving cars  |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on May 5, 2016 14:51:37 GMT -6
I think the roads will be safer with self driving cars I'm not so sure of that, but with human cars and self driving cars mixed together there could be problems. |
|
